Write an introductory paragraph that clearly states your position on ratifying the Constitution, as a Federalist or Anti-Federalist. Write a second paragraph that explains your point of view on how the government is set up under the Constitution.

Write a third paragraph that explains your point of view on including of a bill of rights. Use at least one quote to support your argument. Be sure to explain what the quote means and how it connects to your point.

Write a fourth paragraph to explain why you disagree with the opposing position. For example, if you are writing as a Federalist, you will explain why you disagree with the Anti-Federalist stance. Use at least one new quote to explain why it is not a valid point or how it supports your position.

Write a strong concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument and encourages others to support you.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; earthquake;

answer; ancient times;