Social Studies
Social Studies, 26.01.2021 15:10, arguellesjavier15

Evaluation Exercises 1. Think and write.
a) Like Jaya Prithvi Bahadur Singh, name any two such personalities of
Nepal who have served for the welfare of people. Also write about their
contributions.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, bloodry
Samantha is looking for a boyfriend. based on the gender differences explained in this activity, which is she likely to prefer?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, angelicf394
"all the characteristics and experiences that define each of us as individuals" is the definition of
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30, hilzepesqtatiana
Which statement about jews is not correct? question 6 options: a: jews had been disliked and persecuted for many centuries. b: jews lived and worked in businesses throughout germany. c: many germans blamed jews for germanyโ€™s economic problems. d: jews began migrating to germany after the end of world war i.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Evaluation Exercises 1. Think and write.
a) Like Jaya Prithvi Bahadur Singh, name any two such...

Questions in other subjects: