Martin files a suit against nichelle in a state court over payment due on a short-term employment contract. the case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. the case is appealed to an appellate court.
refer to fact pattern 3-b2. after its review of martin v. nichelle, the appellate court upholds the lower court's verdict. the appellate court has
a. remanded the case.
b. reversed the case.
c. reversed and remanded the case.
d. affirmed the case.

d. affirmed the case.

Explanation:

In cases where one party is not satisfied with a court ruling, such a dissatisfied party can choose to appeal the decision to an appellate court. Upon review of the case, the appellate course can choose to do any of the following;

(a) Uphold the verdict of the trial court, in which case it is said to have affirmed the verdict.

(b) Send the case back to the trial court. In such a case it is said to have remanded the case.

(c) Reject the verdict of the trial court. This means it has reversed the verdict.

Therefore in the case of Martin v. Nichelle, the appellate court has affirmed the case.

the correct labels are as follows:

a: yellow river

b: himalayan mountains

c: north china plain

d: taklimakan desert

answer; caravan;