Please help guys submit ur answers
...
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, stackpoolekrysp71si4
Can i get some on 18,20,& 22? or one of them
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:10, andrewlawton8125
Carly stated, “all pairs of rectangles are dilations.” which pair of rectangles would prove that carly’s statement is incorrect?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 14.10.2019 18:30
History, 14.10.2019 18:30
Geography, 14.10.2019 18:30
Biology, 14.10.2019 18:30
Mathematics, 14.10.2019 18:30