In order to solve for the variable in the equation 2(x+3)+5x = 3(2x-1), Jaleesa begins by applying the distributive property, then combines like terms. Which equation is the result of these steps?
O 7x+6=6X-3
O 2x+6+5X=6X-3
O 2x+3+5x=6x-1
O 7x+3=6x-1
Save and Evit
Noyt

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

b

step-by-step explanation: