Need an answer fast plz: Zoe tried to prove that \triangle AED \cong \triangle CEB△AED≅△CEBtriangle, A, E, D, \cong, triangle, C, E, B. Statement Reason 1 \angle A \cong \angle C∠A≅∠Cangle, A, \cong, angle, C Given 2 \angle DEA \cong \angle BEC∠DEA≅∠BECangle, D, E, A, \cong, angle, B, E, C Given 3 \overline{AE} \cong \overline{EC} AE ≅ EC start overline, A, E, end overline, \cong, start overline, E, C, end overline Given 4 \triangle AED \cong \triangle CEB△AED≅△CEBtriangle, A, E, D, \cong, triangle, C, E, B Angle-side-angle congruence What is the first error Zoe made in her proof? Choose 1 Choose 1 (Choice A) A Zoe used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. (Choice B) B Zoe only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion. (Choice C) C Zoe established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion. (Choice D) D Zoe used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.