Jack sees Jill falling down a hill. At the bottom of the hill, Jill is tumbled over, and clearly endured serious injury. However, while it is not the most ethical conduct, Jack is in a rush and does not feel like helping Jill. Jill attempts to sue Jack for negligence. Which element of negligence will Jill most likely be unable to prove? a. Duty - under the bystander rule, Jack is under no legal obligation to help ill.
b. Breach. Jack had a duty to help jill that he failed to meet by not coming to her rescue.
c. Causation because Jack did not help Jul, she was hurt.
d. Harm - Jill suffered harm as a result of Jack's negligence

The element of negligence will Jill most likely be unable to prove is:

b. Breach. Jack had a duty to help Jill that he failed to meet by not coming to her rescue.

Explanation:

According to the bystander rule, a person does not have the legal duty to rescue or assist another person who is at risk or in danger, even if society imposes a moral obligation for the bystander to provide assistance.  While the law does not require one to jeopardize his own life, to give aid to someone else, the Good Samaritan law imposes some legal duty on the bystander to act in some situations.  However, Jill cannot prove that Jack breached a duty to help her.

answer:

insta, i mean its just better

people who make a question that includes something that isn't a question should be banned