History, 14.01.2022 15:40, kenyakids405
Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of Korematsu’s internment? Due to the war, there was not enough time to hold trials or hearings before sending people to internment camps. The military had a legitimate need to protect against espionage and sabotage. Korematsu had been proven a Japanese spy and a threat to national security.
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, treyceratops1082
Reflect on what you learned in this lesson. write two paragraphs (150-250 words) explaining the benefits of studying history.
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, loganferg9202
After world war ii, many japanese territories were increasingly difficult for japan to control. placed under the control of other nations. granted independence from japan. supportive of the us occupation.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, MrSnuffleBuns4277
In terms of territory won in the french and indian war, which of the following is a true statement? a. england won the most territory as a result of the war. b. france won the most territory as a result of the war. c. spain won the most territory as a result of the war. d. england, france, and spain all won an equal amount of territory as a result of the war.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of Korematsu’s internm...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 19.03.2020 06:31
Mathematics, 19.03.2020 06:31
History, 19.03.2020 06:31
