History
History, 16.07.2021 17:50, jazmaine1217

In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a
public phone without a warrant. Identify one way in which the case is legally
significant.
O A. It led to new laws on who could issue warrants.
• B. It established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
• C. It determined the legal status of phone booths.
O D. It increased the power of the Supreme Court.
N
SUBMIT

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, tansebas1107
How was george washington able to defeat the british in the battle of trenton and princeton
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, charlesrogers38
The eastern roman empire is also known as what empire
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:50, Angela1998
What christian belief does the excerpt show?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 15:30, bargasdevon123
Any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.”—mr. justice hugo black in gideon v. wainwright this quote shows that, because of gideon v. wainwright,
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a
public phone...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 29.01.2021 01:30