What was Fergusons argument in Plessy v. Ferguson

When Plessy was told to vacate the whites-only car, he refused and was arrested. At trial, Plessy's lawyers argued that the Separate Car Act violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The judge found that Louisiana could enforce this law insofar as it affected railroads within its boundaries.

Explanation:

At the Supreme Court of Louisiana, Ferguson argued that the segregation statute breached the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause prohibiting states that 'equal law protection should be granted to any individual under their jurisdiction' and that the Thirteenth amendment prohibiting slavery.'

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.

d) a week

because the land run of 1889, although not without precedent in the history of the west, further, their men were aboard the first trains, ready to jump off and begin staking their claims. oklahoma city, edmond, and guthrie were all so affected.