History, 18.12.2020 02:40, omojay3103

Is cabinet battle song a secondary source or a primary source? Do you trust this source? Do you think it is reliable? Why or why not?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

answered: Guest

it would be

germany had to pay all damages related to the war.

and i think

germany had to take sole responsibility for the war.

answered: Guest

answer

$x = \pm 2\sqrt{2} \: \: or \: \: x = \pm 1$

explanation

the given equation is

${x}^{4} - 9 {x}^{2} + 8 = 0$

we can rewrite this as:

$({x}^{2})^{2} - 9 {x}^{2} + 8 = 0$

let

$u = {x}^{2}$

then the equation becomes:

${u}^{2} - 9 {u}^{2} + 8 = 0$

the factors of 8 that sum up to -9 are {-1,-8}

we split the middle term with these factors to obtain,

${u}^{2} - u - 8u+ 8 = 0$

we factor by grouping to obtain:

$u(u - 1) - 8(u - 1) = 0$

$(u - 8)(u - 1) = 0$

apply the zero product property to get:

$u - 8 = 0 \: \: or \: \: u - 1 = 0$

$u = 8 \: or \: u = 1$

but

$u = {x}^{2}$

${x}^{2} = 8 \: or \: {x}^{2} = 1$

$x = \pm \sqrt{8} \: \: or \: \: x = \pm \: \sqrt{ 1}$

$x = \pm 2\sqrt{2} \: \: or \: \: x = \pm 1$

answered: Guest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answered: Guest

the answer is flapper.

branliest and you.

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 22.06.2019 02:30, kharmaculpepper

What were three advantages the north had in the civil war? it was fighting most battles on home ground. it had a greater number of soldiers. it had more highly skilled military leaders. it had a stronger navy. it had a better network of railroads. pick three .

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 04:00, luxmimspcbcxf

What happened during the victorian age? a. all social classes lived near each other b. the middle class became much larger c. city populations began to decrease d. families continued to go to work together

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 05:20, kobz

As a religious faith, candomblé appropriates beliefs from both a. african faiths and catholicism b. hinduism and catholicism c. hinduism and islam d. buddhism and catholicism

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:30, wowwowumbsi

I’m 1933,hitler took action jews in germany by

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Is cabinet battle song a secondary source or a primary source? Do you trust this source? Do you thin...