Which is a true statement about the privileges and immunities clause?
o the privileges and immunities clause deals with amending the constitution.
o the privileges and immunities clause deals with rights for enslaved persons.
the privileges and immunities clause deals with shared rights for citizens.
o the privileges and immunities clause deals with ratifying the constitution.

The Privileges and Immunities Clause deals with shared rights for citizens.

Explanation:

This clause refers to that found in Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution that states the following: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. This clause, then, deals with shared rights for citizens: it regulates how a state must treat citizens of other states, it requires state governments to protect the fundamental rights of citizens of other states, and, thus, it prevents a state from discriminating those citizens.

The Privileges and Immunities Clause prevents a state from treating citizens of other states in a discriminatory manner. Because of this I believe the correct answer is "rhe Privileges and Immunities Clause deals with shared rights for citizens" (Number 3)

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.