What types of evidence support inferences about characters in a play? Select three options.

Group of answer choices.

A. characters' thoughts and actions.

B. the number of characters on stage.

C. characters' appearances and ways of dressing.

D. characters' responses to other characters.

E. the names of the characters.

A. characters' thoughts and actions.

C. characters' appearances and ways of dressing.

D. characters' responses to other characters.

Explanation:

A play can be defined as a literary work that presents the dialogue between characters, as well as portrayal of fictional and non-fictional events in a theatre.

In a play, a character list is a list that comprises of both protagonists and antagonists that are featured in a play. A protagonist is the lead, principal or chief (main) character in a story, play or film. Thus, a protagonist refers to the character that is being closely followed by an audience or a reader in order to determine the character's fate at the end of the story or play.

On the other hand, an antagonist is a character that opposes the protagonist.

In English language, an inference can be defined as an act or process which typically involves a person deducing the meaning or message from something through induction.

Hence, the types of evidence that support inferences about characters in a play include the following;

I. The characters' thoughts and actions can be used to draw an inference about the nature or behavior of each characters.

II. The characters' appearances and ways of dressing gives an insight on the characters.

III. The characters' responses to other characters.

the text includes parts of primary-source interviews with enslaved people to illustrate the difficulty of life on a sugar plantation in louisiana.

explanation:

now, of course, the quality and the seasonability of these winter dreams varied, but the stuff of them remained.   they persuaded dexter several years later to pass up a business course at the state university—his father, prospering now, would have paid his way—for the precarious advantage of attending an older and more famous university in the east, where he was bothered by his scanty funds. but do not get the impression, because his winter dreams happened to be concerned at first with musings on the rich, that there was anything merely snobbish in the boy. he wanted not association with glittering things and glittering people—he wanted the glittering things themselves. often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it—and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges.

there you go thats what we are missing