Nor is this a partisan issue. in a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics. this is not even a legal or legislative issue alone. it is better to settle these matters in the courts than on the streets, and new laws are needed at every level, but law alone cannot make men see right. we are confronted primarily with a moral issue. it is as old as the scriptures and is as clear as the american constitution.

which sentence from the excerpt best explains the point of the logical appeal that president kennedy makes?

a. in a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics.

b. this is not even a legal or legislative issue alone.

c. it is better to settle these matters in the courts than on the streets, and new laws are needed at every level, but law alone cannot make men see right.

d. we are confronted primarily with a moral issue.

B) This is not even a legal or legislative issue alone.

Explanation: When writing, an author can use several rhetorical devices in order to persuade, inform or impact the audience in the desired way. One of the must used rhetorical devices is logos, which is an appeal to the audience's logic. From the given options, the sentence that best explains the point of the logical appeal that President Kennedy makes in the excerpt, is the corresponding to option B: This is not even a legal or legislative issue alone.

rudy is the nazi ideal, unfortunately for the nazis his ideal comes in the form of jesse the complete opposite of those who embrace the idea of white supremacy. over the course of the novel, rudy learns that he wants nothing to do with the hitler youth, and because of this his parents are forced to make a bargain; rudy's father is forced into the military, so that his son can remain home.   both liesel and hans influence that young man that rudy becomes. following han's example, rudy puts aside his own hunger to risk his life so that the jewish prisoners might have bread to eat.

the correct answer is "dissent"

explanation:

because dissent is when one or more judges express disagreement with the majority in court, in specific legal systems.   an   argument in opposition is presented to the court, with a different interpretation, or application.