English
English, 22.02.2021 01:20, Hockeypro1127

From his definitions of proof, probability, and miracle, Hume concludes, “That no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony is of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact, which it endeavors to establish; and even in that case there is a mutual destruction of arguments, and the superior only gives us an assurance suitable to that degree of force, which remains, after deducting the inferior.” What does he mean by this, and why does he think that it proves that, in principle, we cannot ever trust testimony about miracles?

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 15:30, jeanetteelliotp9ru6m
Describe de setting of the 1980 bbc adaptation. what time and time and place are indicated by the set and costumes ?
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 17:30, kiki3002
Writing about thing people usually do
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 18:40, SkyeShadow525
"the story of icarus and daedalus," by ovid and "musée des beaux arts," by w. h. auden. then answer the question. what information in auden's poem is not included in ovid's story of icarus and daedalus?
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:30, jaydanicole22
Yosemite has spectacular scenery and which has half-time bears. how do i write i. parallel structure?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
From his definitions of proof, probability, and miracle, Hume concludes, “That no testimony is suffi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Engineering, 22.02.2021 22:50
Konu
Mathematics, 22.02.2021 22:50