How do the people at the train station show their loyalty and devotion to Hachiko after Dr. Ueno dies? Explain how the people's actions show the importance of Hachiko's story to the people of Tokyo.

8Points

Use the RACE strategy in order to answer this question. You must include all parts of RACE in order to receive the full points.

Hachiko is a touching true story about a faithful dog who awaits his master, Dr. Ueno, every dat outside Tokyo's Shubuya railway station. This story is recounted through the eyes of Ken taro, a fictional boy who meets Hachiko in Shibuya station and befriends her.

Hachiko has waited for his owner's return in the same spot every day for ten years, even after Dr. Ueno's death. Following Hachiko's death, a statue was erected in his honor, which can still be seen in Shibuya Station today.

To know more about Hachiko, refer to the link:

link

Answer 1:

R- Restate the question:

How do the people at the train station show their loyalty and devotion to Hachiko after Dr. Ueno dies?

A- Answer to the question:

Hachiko was Dr. Ueno's dog. It was an Akita breed that would wait for Dr. Ueno at the train station for 9 years until it died. When the dog -  Hachiko died, the people of the train station showed their loyalty and devotion to it by burying it beside Dr. Ueno. The cemetery where Dr.  Ueno was buried is located in Aoyama Cemetery, Tokyo, Japan.

Before the death of the dog, a memorial in the form of a statue made of bronze was set up for the dog in front of the train station. This was in 1934. The dog Hachiko died in 1935.

C- Cite Evidence from the text:

Please see lines 1-4 under sub-heading Hachiko.

E - Explain the Text Evidence

The people of Tokyo immortalized Hachiko because its actions showed that loyalty was important to them. It was a way of telling generations of Japanese to come as well as the whole world that loyalty was and is an important value system to the people of Japan, Tokyo especially.  

Cheers!

first person

explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this