Fredrick Douglas was against slavery and wanted to try to end it, or at least give most of the slave’s freedom, by crossing them over the Mason-Dixon line. Captain Cannot on the other hand was all for the idea of slavery, believing that there was nothing wrong with enslaving other humans just because they have darker skin. Both use amazing evidence and present their information very straight-forward. But my teacher said You've got a great start to your response. You shared the beliefs of each man, but you are missing specific evidence from the text to support your ideas. If you choose to add it in, resubmit for more points.

so can someone help me with this?

Match each word from richard connell's short story "the most dangerous game" to its correct meaning. placid doggedly zealous scruples with determination arrowright extremely passionate arrowright morals arrowright calm arrowright

In poem daffodils-how do we know that the yellow daffodils has a long lasting effect on the speaker.

In the space below, write a five-paragraph, 600-800 word persuasive essay arguing whether or not your chosen speech is effective in communicating its message, based on how it uses rhetorical strategies. include a clear thesis statement identifying whether, in your view, the speaker's argument is effective, based on his or her use of rhetorical strategies. explain why or why not. give your audience a sense of closure by providing a clear conclusion. throughout the essay, be sure to: use formal, objective language for an academic audience, connect your ideas using transitions that clearly tie together your ideas, base your argument on evidence from the text of the speech, and provide a clear conclusion about the speech's effectiveness.