Compare the actual text to the clip shown. How are they different besides the language shown? Here is where your analysis skills come in. Are these two giving us the same ideas that Shakespeare presented for
his period? How? Which is the stronger argument for YOU? Why? Look at Shakespeare's language in the
text, think about the fact that he was writing for the stage not a movie? How does the format of these two
change how it could be presented?

ur mom

explanation:

b

explanation:

imparadis't in one anothers arms  

the happier eden, shall enjoy their fill  

of bliss on bliss, while i to hell am thrust,  

where neither joy nor love, but fierce desire,  

among our other torments not the least,  

still unfulfill'd with pain of longing pines;  

yet let me not forget what i have gain'd  

from their own mouths; all is not theirs it seems:  

one fatal tree there stands of knowledge call'd,  

forbidden them to taste: knowledge forbidd'n?  

suspicious, reasonless. why should their lord  

envie them that? can it be sin to know,