Read the passage from a room of one's own.
which statement best explains how the structure of this
text supports woolf's purpose?
there was an enormous body of masculine opinion to the
effect that nothing could be expected of women
intellectually. even if her father did not read out loud these
opinions, any girl could read them for herself, and the
reading, even in the nineteenth century, must have lowered
her vitality, and told profoundly upon her work. there would
always have been that assertion--you cannot do this, you
are incapable of doing that—to protest against, to
overcome. probably for a novelist this germ is no longer of
much effect; for there have been women novelists of merit.
but for painters it must still have some sting in it, and for
musicians, i imagine, is even now active and poisonous in
the extreme. the woman composer stands where the
actress stood in the time of shakespeare.
the compare-contrast structure the reader
understand how women artists in a variety of disciplines
have been affected by cultural norms.
the cause-effect structure supports the point of view
that men, particularly fathers are often the source of
young women's oppression
the problem-solution structure supports the point of
view that conditions for women artists in most disciplines
have improved dramatically.
the chronological structure illustrates the pressures
discouraging women artists from pursuing their passions
from youth to adulthood.

this question is grammatically incorrect and is illegible to me so i can not answer.

with mrs. linde, nora reveals her insensitivity and lack of shame about the forgery she committed. she implies that mrs. linde has obviously aged since they last met 10 years earlier, which accounts for nora’s inability to recognize her old friend. although nora seems sympathetic to mrs. linde’s plight, she can’t seem to control herself from boasting about her three children, her husband’s recent promotion, and how good she feels to finally have some money to spend. in a way, she seems to be flaunting her good fortune in front of mrs. linde who, deprived of all these benefits, has come to ask nora for . it is also through her interactions with mrs. linde that we realize something deeper lies under nora’s seemingly childish exterior. she reveals the secret of her forgery to mrs. linde and seems to see herself as quite resourceful for having done it.

in the company of dr. rank, nora is freer than she is with her own husband. she openly laughs with joy at knowing that all the other bank employees will be under her husband’s control. she offers dr. rank a macaroon, apparently forgetting that he knows she is forbidden to eat them. she then quickly covers for herself by claiming that mrs. linde brought them. nora seems much more assertive and free with these other characters, as well as unabashedly willing to scheme, lie, and justify her transgressions as altruistic.  

krogstad provides an interesting parallel to nora. like nora, he too is guilty of committing forgery, for which torvald condemns him and decides to fire him. although krogstad is a man and nora a woman, their crimes of forgery unite them. in fact, krogstad might represent what nora would be like if she were a man and were not strictly scrupulous like her husband is. for example, she tells mrs. linde that "a barrister's profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won't undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally torvald has never been willing to do that." perhaps nora would have delved into the unsavory, given how opposite she is to her husband. krogstad's is also the only harsh voice of reality that nora is forced to hear, and that is because he blackmails her for her regaining his job at the bank. finally, torvald’s reaction to krogstad’s forgery seems to foreshadow his harsh and cold reaction to nora’s forgery.

poop

explanation:

cuz its trash