What is the main argument of the passage? what claims does the author make to support the argument? how valid, relevant, and sufficient is the reasoning and evidence used to support the argument and claims? does the author use false statements or fallacious reasoning to support the argument and claims? use evidence from the text to support your response. your evaluation of the argument should be two or three complete paragraphs.

Iam for the "immediate, unconditional, and universal" enfranchisement of the black man, in ev [loud applause.] without this, his liberty is a mockery; without this, you might as well almost slavery for his condition; for in fact, if he is not the slave of the individual master, he is the slay liberty as a privilege, not as a right. he is at the mercy of the mob, and has no means of protec how does the repetition of the phrase "without this" support the paragraph's argument? it reinforces the idea that without equality in the us, the idea of a free society is a joke. it suggests that a free society is possible, with or without equal rights for all people. it indicates that douglass would be content without material possessions or status. it proposes that slavery will not be abolished in the us without the support of all citizens.

Aspy novel would probably be a novel of

Aprimary source: a- may be biased b- is never biased c- cannot possibly have bias d- none of the above