The owner of Cafe Bakka is considering investing in a new point-of-sale system. He spent $10,000 on his current point-of-sale system five years ago. The new point-of-sale technology will cost $25,000, and will dramatically improve the speed at which his counter staff will be able to take orders, and reduce the owner's administrative work. How should the owner account for the cost of the current point-of-sale technology when performing the capital budgeting analysis to determine whether or not to purchase the new point-of-sale technology? a. He should include the cost of the current point-of-sale system as part of the cost of the new point-of-sale system.
b. He should ignore the cost of the current point-of-sale system when evaluating the cost of the new point-of-sale system.
c. He should include half of the cost of the current point-of-sale system when evaluating the cost of the new point-of-sale system.

A large soft-drink company currently produces regular cola and diet cola. It is considering introducing a new soft drink that tastes like regular cola but has zero calories like the diet cola. The new zero-calorie drink that tastes like regular cola is most likely to produceexternality.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

Which is the most compelling reason why mobile advertising is related to big data?

How is challah bread made? if i have to dabble the recipe?