In samson v. federal express corporation, samson sued federal express under the ada, claiming his job offer as a technician was withdrawn solely because he had failed his dot medical examination because he had diabetes – a disqualifier for operating a motor vehicle in interstate commerce. what was the appellate court's ruling?

The answer is: The court revoked and referred for new procedures.

Explanation:

The court concluded that reasonable jurors could differ as to whether the FedEx truck test drive was an essential function of the Technician position.

The court also concluded that the occasional driving test of empty FedEx trucks in the Fort Myers area did not constitute the transportation of property or passengers in interstate commerce.

Therefore, the FMCR did not force FedEx to require the plaintiff to obtain DOT medical certification to be "qualified" for the Technician position.

The FMCR did not grant FedEx a defense against the claimant's disability discrimination claims.

Consequently, the court revoked and referred for new procedures.

The answer is: The court revoked and referred for new procedures.

answer: penis

explanation: