Lines 262–272: Why does Beowulf allow one of his followers to be taken by Grendel before he attacks him? Lines 290–305: What do the setting details in this passage reveal about Anglo-Saxon civilization?

Lines 314–327: Why is Grendel such a formidable opponent? What is the significance of the inability of Beowulf’s men to help him?

Lines 332–359: What evidence supports the idea that the fight between Grendel and Beowulf is symbolic of the struggle between good and evil? How does the symbolism of Beowulf’s gesture in lines 356–359 reveal a theme resulting from this conflict?

Lines 370–375: How do the alliteration and imagery affect the impact of this part of the poem?

Lines 376–380: How does this passage relate to the Anglo-Saxon view of immortality?

Lines 387–397: How does this scene reflect the techniques used by Anglo-Saxon poet
Lines 400–424: What details and techniques does the poet use to convey the brutality of Grendel’s mother’s attack? What is the significance of her actions? What do they foreshadow about future events?
​

Which element in the powerpoint application is not available in the microsoft word® application?

Padma has written a paper on the effects of the black death, a plague that struck europe in 1347 and killed millions of people. she focused on three major results of the plague: • a smaller population after the plague led to higher wages and greater independence for workers. • the power of the catholic church weakened because so many members had died and others had lost their faith. • a lack of farm workers led more people to raise livestock rather than planting crops, changing the european diet. read her conclusion: it does not seem right to say that an experience as horrifying as the black death had any “good” sides. still, the changes that followed the plague improved the lives of peasants. people who had previously lived in poverty, forced to work for a single employer, now had higher wages and the freedom to change jobs. even so, the continent had been devastated and would take many years to recover. which statement best evaluates her conclusion? a. the conclusion effectively summarizes all the writer’s main points. b. the conclusion is engaging, but it introduces an unnecessary new idea. c. the conclusion is engaging, but only summarizes one of the writer’s points. d. the conclusion is engaging but it does not summarize any of the writer’s main points.

Effective decision-making means comparing the additional costs of alternatives with the . total costs diminishing utility marginal benefits