When summarizing a complex piece of literature, which of the following would not be an effective way to prepare your summary?

Castor et pollux, fratres, in multis bellis magna virtute pugnabant et multos hostes superaverunt. olim magna tempestas (storm) ad navem appropinquabat (came near), sed auxilio deorum discessit. tum nautae in capitibus castoris et pollucis duas stellas viderunt. "dei ipsi in capitibus fratrum has stellas posuerunt," omnes clamaverunt. "fratres boni sunt causae salutis nostrae! " postea acer hostis castorem interfecit et hic ad inferos (underworld) properavit (hastened). maximus dolor pollucem occupavit, sed is erat immortalis (immortal) quod filius dei erat. sine fratre suo pollux erat miserrimus et tristis. pollux ex patre deorum ipso oravit, "ego laetissime vitam meam," dicit, "pro fratre meo donabo." iuppiter autem dixit se castori unum diem vitae, polluci unum diem mortis donaturum esse. itaque locum fratrum cotidie (daily) mutavit. iuppiter duas stellas in caelo locavit. homines fratres geminos (twins) appellabant. do not use google i will not give you and i will report your question if you do use google translate. seventy points!

Read the sentence. at the end of the day, the dusk was filled by the coyote's haunting call. which revision puts the sentence in the active voice while maintaining the meaning? at the end of the day, the coyote’s haunting call filled the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote’s call haunted and filled the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote’s call was haunting the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote was calling the haunted dusk.

Metals are good conductors due to the presence of many