Social Studies
Social Studies, 24.07.2019 10:00, brainguy124

dr. zhang notices that his client, mariel, becomes very defensive when asked to elaborate on her financial difficulties. dr. zhang infers that mariel has likely been defensive with her parents and supervisors at work as well. what technique is dr. zhang using to make his inference?

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:30, serafimharmane4944
What rules did the monroe doctrine set for the united states?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30, drew3vans34
In article v of the united states constitution, the amendment process is explained. why did the framers include provisions for amending the constitution? a) to limit the individual liberties of american citizens b) to allow the constitution to adapt to future circumstances c) to allow the president to change the constitution as needed eliminate d) to ensure that state governments had more power than the nation
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10, epmeche05
Rational ignorance suggests that a. voters are ignorant on issues that are not of special interest to them b. voters do not pursue information about issues before voting c. low voter turnout is due to a lack of understanding of the platforms of each political party d. voters are uninterested in the electoral process
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
dr. zhang notices that his client, mariel, becomes very defensive when asked to elaborate on her fin...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.09.2019 23:30