Harold is a middle-aged man living a peaceful suburban life with his family. he has accumulated quite some wealth through operating a small business. he wants his assets and wealth to be proportionately distributed between his wife and children. harold hires an attorney to create a document specifying this distribution. which phase of the financial life cycle is harold in?

Harold is a middle-aged man living a peaceful suburban life with his family. He has accumulated quite some wealth through operating a small business. He wants his assets and wealth to be proportionately distributed between his wife and children. Harold hires an attorney to create a document specifying this distribution. Which phase of the financial life cycle is Harold in? Harold is in the final and third stage of the financial life cycle: "distribution"

Explanation:

Harold is in the distribution because he has accumulated money in his early stages, he preserved his wealth and kept it growing by running his business as well as his assets. So now after being part of the workforce, leaving it to start a business, getting his assets and wealth, managing it and preserving it to kept it growing he retired, and now that he has come to an age in which he has to think about what his family is going to do when he is dead, he has hired an attorney to plan the distribution. He is already in the distribution cycle but he is planning it in the ultimate level this cycle can have.

i would say d tho   ctfvygbuhinjmlk

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )