What were ritzer’s conclusions on “the implication is that postindustrial society will be dominated by creative knowledge workers and not by routinized employees of the mcdonaldized system.”?

Ritzer's is endeavoring to infer that routinized representatives of the McDonaldized framework will have close to nothing, to no situation in the public arena. He imagines this since laborers in the postindustrial society are commanding with higher characteristics, for example, propelled innovation, high esteems, more brilliant individuals and a dependable job. On the other hand, lesser job holders are vulnerable to bring down wages, physically challenging errands and possibly these add to work misfortune and life stresses. In general, Ritzer accentuation reminds us society will be ruled by the creative information specialists who have the adequate specified attributes and how qualifying with those qualities will prompt the predominance of the postindustrial society.

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.