Manifest Destiny, associated with the Democratic Party was the main issue in the election of President James K. Polk in 1844. Polk advocated both the annexation of Texas (which, it was commonly understood, would likely lead to war with Mexico) and the assertion of American claims on territory in Oregon.
Clearly Manifest Destiny had a big impact on the united states, fueling its expansion all the way to the Pacific, making America what it is today. ... Manifest Destiny brought money, land, resources, and a strengthened economy to the Americans.
Hola, Como Estas? In the election of 1844, James K. Polk defeated Henry Clay for president. Polk was known as "Young Hickory" ,after Andrew Jackson, due to his similar beliefs and his birth in Pineville, NC only some 20 miles from Jackson's birthplace.Polk ran on a very clear "Manifest Destiny" platform.In the 1840s and 1850s, many Americans felt that God had "manifestly" destined the American people to spread their democratic institutions over the entire continent and even over South America as well. To vote for Polk was to vote for expansion. Polk's victory was perceived by him as a "mandate" by the American people—an order to go ahead with expansion of the United States. Manifest Destiny played a huge role in the election of 1844 and is what ultimately decided who the Presidency would go to.-Autumn
Manifest Destiny brought money, land, resources, and a strengthened economy to the Americans. There were also negative effects of Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny brought money, land, resources, and a strengthened economy to the Americans. There were also negative effects of Manifest Destiny. The negative effect that this had on Native Americans were lasting effects. Manifest Destiny also caused war and tension with Mexico for the same reasons.
Th answer is stated below.
The philosophy of manifest destiny prevailed during the nineteenth-century American society. It believes in the idea that it is the destiny of the United States to spread the ideals of democracy and capitalism. The ideology was used to forceful remove the native Indians from their traditional lands and justify westward expansion.
hope this helps i actually just learned about this in class :)
Manifest destiny played a really important role in the expansion to Oregon, which was in dispute with Britain. Thousands of Americans migrated to Oregon in the 1840s over the Oregon Trail. Britain was trying to move the boundary line to include more of present day Washington state but people in support of Manifest Destiny wanted all of Oregon. There was a lot of back and forth on the issue, especially when President Polk was elected. Eventually they settled with only part of Oregon (at the time) because the US was able to enter the Mexican-American War and did not want to fight with Great Britain as well.
Texas was originally owned by Mexico but in 1836 they declared their independence from Mexico and became the Republic of Texas. Then Texas requested to join the US. While the US wanted the land, it was controversial because Texas was place where slaves could be owned and a lot of Democratic politicians in the US government disagreed on the subject. James K. Polk favored the annexation of Texas and when he was elected as president he approved expansion to Texas.
Essentially, Manifest Destiny acted as a platform for people to support expansion to places like Texas and Oregon despite the conflicts they encountered in acquiring the lands.
the answer is the petition of right.
offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown. taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.