Which city appears to be the focus of the crusaders efforts? which crusade did not make it there

The arrival of the conquistadors affected every indigenous people group they encountered. in this activity, you will write letters from the point of view of an incan and a conquistador. research the topic on the internet or at the library before writing. each letter should contain at least two paragraphs and be at least eight sentences long. 1) you are an inca and the conquistadors have arrived in your village! write a letter to be sent to other incan villages. describe your thoughts about the conquistadors and how their arrival might change your life. 2) write a letter from the point of view of a conquistador meeting the incas for the first time. address the letter to your family back in spain. me! i would really appreciate it! my dog died this morning and we are trying to fill out a form for her. it would amazing if you could me on this.

What words in the preamble to the constitution reflect the principle of popular sovereignty

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.