Social Studies
Social Studies, 31.07.2019 11:00, coryintheswamp

When world war i broke out in europe, the president woodrow wilson promised u. s. neutrality in the conflict. in this situation, what does neutrality mean? a) the united states would support england, but not by fighting. b) the united states would only get involved if directly attacked. c) the united states would sell weapons to both sides, but would not fight. eliminate d) the united states would not enter the war on either side of the conflict.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30, wendy1538
Although the ideas of ren and li were originally buddhist principles, confucius adopted them as his own and they eventually became the center of confucian philosophy. select the best answer from the choices provided true or false
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, narwalmaster2001
Most galaxies in the universe are irregular-shaped galaxies. true or false ?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30, emmanuelmashao6704
Which of the following situations best demonstrates the principle of separation of powers in the u. s. government? a. the president can veto laws passed by the legislature. b. the courts must approve constitutional amendments. c. states create their own educational policies. d. members of the legislature are elected by voters.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
When world war i broke out in europe, the president woodrow wilson promised u. s. neutrality in the...

Questions in other subjects: