Social Studies, 04.08.2019 10:30, frtjay

Random assignments would be most critical in what type of research?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:30, floresguppy

Afull irb committee meeting is convened and one agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning-disabled child. the inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. the protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. the committee determined that the mother's required task may upset the child. the irb approved the study with appropriate language in the parental permission form regarding the possibility that children might become upset. after the start of the study, the principal investigator reports to the irb that, as expected, one of the children became upset. the incident was handled according to the protocol and the child is fine. what should the irb do with regard to this report?

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30, zekiyekaya0571

What statement shows that the agreement between the fictional nations of ziberia and deerkey is a free trade agreement?

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00, rorea710

These facilities were organized and sponsored by churches or charities during the great depression in an effort to feed the homeless and needy.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.