Why were abolitionists opposed to how cotton was produced in the south

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

After world war i, how did the allied countries hope to keep germany from becoming too powerful again? question 5 options: united states took over german military bases. germany was not allowed to have a large army or navy. germany was allowed to keep its colonies. germany did not have to pay any war debts to the allied countries.

What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?