Alawyer trying to understand why a particular supreme court justice often agreed with the court's rulings, but not the reasoning behind them, should study that justice's a. concurring opinions b. appellate opinions c. majority opinions d. dissenting opinions

If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.

Explanation:

If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.

Unless, on the grounds of evaluating the case, no actual majority of the court may consent, the court's ruling may be found in a variety of concurrent opinions, and the concurrent opinion reached by the largest number of judges is considered the plurality opinion.

if you have ask any question and if you have got the answer reply for your position there will be option for making a brain least answer you need to click click there and they can get the points in brain list main thing is that you need to choose those answer which answer you are you think that it is to you