When a bible psalm is sung, betty parris wails. ann putnam concludes that this shows the child has been touched by the devil. explain why this is a logical fallacy. what is the actual case of betty's wailing?

It's logical fallacy on the grounds that Betty's wailing can't be specifically connected to being controlled by the devil. There is no proof that the devil caused her wailing and there lies the flaw of her rationale. Wailing by a ten year old can be caused by anything. Betty is wailing in light of the fact that she is terrified of Abby and knows she's equipped for insane extravagant things, she doesn't know why she's attempting to help Abigail with her plan. Betty is extremely frightened.

Bob: coke is baby pandas.jim: what? how do you figure that coke is baby pandas? bob: because this book says so.jim: how do we know the book is correct? bob: because it says that coke is baby pandas.jim: how does that prove the book's accuracy? bob: because it's statement involving coke and baby pandas is correct, therefore it is accurate.jim: how do we know that it's correct? bob: because we have concluded that the book is accurate, and therefore the statement is correct.therefore, coke is baby pandas.