Supporters and opponents of the citizens united v. federal election commission ruling would most disagree about the answer to which question? a. does the supreme court have the right to overturn congress's campaign finance laws? b. was the citizens united organization biased in favor of one candidate? c. should campaign finance laws be different for local, state, and national elections? d. are corporate campaign contributions and advertisements protected forms of free speech?

The correct answre is D.

Citizens United v. FEC was a case which led to the enactment of a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court in 2010.

The Federal Election Comission, a conservative non-profit organization, broadcasted an advertsiment against the aspiration of Hilary Clinton during the 2008 presidential election. Such ad had an audience superior to 50,000.

The freedom of speech right, guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, states that goverment cannot limit communications financed with private funds and performed by nonprofit corporations, for-profit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.

On the other hand, the federal law explicitly prohibits such organizations from  "electioneering communication" in the 60 days prior to the election, if these communications reach more than 50,000 people from the electorate. Therefore, the US Supreme Court declared that the Federal Election Comission had acted against the federal law and the US Constitution.

the atm that sounds like it should be the answer

heyo, whats up

when you sing louad enough the vibration of you voice is able to shatter glass so yes vibration is your answer

if this mark brainliest i wolud be happy and have a great day you!