Remember that overwhelmingly sad feeling when you learned that someone you loved died? remember the guilt and embarrassment you felt after your biggest failure was exposed? remember facing the biggest problem in your life and thinking that it was impossible to fix? remember that time, as a little kid, when someone held you under the swimming pool too long, and you thought you were going to drown? roll all of those emotions into one, carry them around with you every day from the time you wake up until the time you fall asleep, and you will begin to understand the dragon of depression.

na idade média, existia o santo ofício, responsável pela censura. hoje em dia, em um país democrático, temos algo que se assemelha a essa medida que é quando o governo impõe censura a um indivíduo ou meio de comunicação.

por constituição:

"art. 5º da constituição federal - inc. ix - é livre a expressão da atividade intelectual, artística, científica e de comunicação, independentemente de censura ou licença;

liberdade de expressão a garantia assegurada a qualquer indivíduo de se manifestar, buscar e receber ideias e informações de todos os tipos, com ou sem a intervenção de terceiros, por meio de linguagens oral, escrita, artística ou qualquer outro meio de comunicação. "

esse direito da constituição, quando contrariado, é o mais próximo ao julgamento político de obras e ações da antiguidade.

on the first day of new student week, amber revealed to her roommate that she is a lesbian. this is an example of self-disclosure.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; underachivement;