Please help! Let’s see whether quadratic voting can avoid the paradox of voting that arose in Table 5.3 when using 1p1v in a series of paired-choice majority votes. To reexamine this situation using quadratic voting, the table below presents the maximum willingness to pay of Garcia, Johnson, and Lee for each of the three public goods. Notice that each person’s numbers for willingness to pay match her or his ordering of preferences (1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice) presented in Table 5.3. Thus, Garcia is willing to spend more on her first choice of national defense ($400) than on her second choice of a road ($100) or her third choice of a weather warning system ($0).