The State Department has four major goals to achieve its foreign policy objectives. Those goals are: undermining America, suppressing democracy, denouncing American
values, and neglecting diplomatic officials.

True or False?

False

Explanation:

undermining America, is wrong because it means to weaken

suppressing democracy, is wrong because it means to forcibly put an end to.

denouncing American  values, is wrong because, it means to publicly declare to be wrong or evil.

neglecting diplomatic officials, is wrong because it means failing to care for properly.

Here are the correct answers

The State Department has four main foreign policy goals:

Protect the United States and Americans;

Advance democracy, human rights, and other global interests;

Promote international understanding of American values and policies; and

Support U.S. diplomats, government officials, and all other personnel at home and abroad who make these goals a reality.

first, the romans stayed isolated because they had to defend their own territories from neighboring cities that were harassing them, like the etruscans. second, once the romans managed to defeat their neighbors, and started to expand their territory, they started to build roads and bridges. finally, now that the romans have covered their territory with roads functioning as highways, they could mobilize their legions faster to assemble larger military units in a specific place

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )