Social Studies
Social Studies, 06.12.2021 16:30, aero8030

Use your knowledge about fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of illicit transference to determine which, if any, of the following statements are true. 1. The fallacy of composition is committed when the conclusion of an argument depends on the mistaken transfer of an attribute from a whole thing to the parts of that thing.
2. An arguer may commit the begging the question fallacy by simply restating a questionable premise in slightly different language.
3. The fallacy of amphiboly usually involves an ambiguous use of language by someone other than the arguer, whereas the fallacy of equivocation typically involves the arguer's own ambiguous use of language.
4. An arguer often commits the equivocation fallacy by ignoring questionable premises.
6. The fallacies of presumption occur because the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion.
7. The fallacies of ambiguity include equivocation. The fallacies of illicit transference include complex question.
8. The fallacies of illicit transference arise from an ambiguity in either the premises or conclusion of an argument.
9. The fallacies of presumption include complex question.
10. The fallacies of illicit transference include begging the question.
111. If an argument mistakenly transfers an attribute from the parts to the whole of something, then the arguer commits the fallacy of composition.
12. The fallacy of false dichotomy is committed when multiple questions are posed in the guise of a single question, so as to invite a single answer to more than one question.
13. The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores important evidence that may outweigh evidence that is otherwise presented in the premises.
14. The fallacy of division is committed when the conclusion of an argument depends on the mistaken transfer of an attribute from the parts of something to the whole of that thing.
15. The fallacy of false dichotomy occurs when a disjunctive premise presents two alternatives as though they were jointly exhaustive, when in fact other likely alternatives are available.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, nia454
What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:20, arunamvr
Which is the best description of how a scholarship differs from a federal education grant?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00, yolandacoles3066
What was the greatest contribution of the “scientific method”?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 12:10, studybug7952
Learn more about these three critical analysis theories: guide to new historicism and cultural studies guide to feminist criticism guide to psychoanalytic criticism re-read "the boarded window," by ambrose bierce. answer the three essential questions for each critical analysis theory in complete sentences using examples from the text to support your answer.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Use your knowledge about fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of illicit...

Questions in other subjects: