As part of her graduate research, Lydia conducted a study on how college-age students respond to hypothetical moral dilemmas. She read the dilemmas aloud to the participants and then asked a series of questions. When a participant responded in a manner that supported her hypothesis, Lydia nodded slightly in agreement. Lydia's behavior illustrates the concept of:

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?