Although different types of radical behaviorists disagree over elements of their theories, the primary factor that sets them apart from other types of psychologists who study personality and behavior is the idea that .

Is there such a thing as a social structure that constrains individual action, or is society nothing more than a figment of our imaginations?

Tracey is a financial planner who received his cfp designation. tracey does not have any other designations or licenses. although tracey's expertise is investment planning, he is anxious to expand his client base and is willing to assist clients with any area of financial planning. over the last month tracey engaged in the following activities with troy, a new client. a. during the initial meeting, tracey collected personal data about troy including the estate planning documents troy had previously executed. b. during the second meeting, tracey recommended the use of a trust to fulfill some of troy's estate planning goals. c. troy called tracey one afternoon and asked if tracey could explain the probate process to him, which tracey promptly did. d. tracey downloaded a copy of a generic will from the internet, filled in troy's information and gave the document to troy to be executed. of the activities above, which would be considered the unauthorized practice of law?

The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?