Social Studies, 09.10.2021 08:00, weitz3584
in reno v. aclu, the supreme court struck down the communications decency act for violating the amendment.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, Amyra2003
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, alexandraparava
Pls will give brainliest and 5star asap pls
Answers: 1
in reno v. aclu, the supreme court struck down the communications decency act for violating the ame...
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 21:30
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 21:30
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 21:30
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 21:30