Some philosophers have held that the Principle of Sufficient Reason is (or can be) known intuitively to be true. Rowe questions this reasoning because: Question 4 options: though there are some statements that can be known intuitively to be true, it is doubtful that many of us, if any, know intuitively that the Principle of Sufficient Reason is true. although metaphysical statements can be known intuitively to be true, the Principle of Sufficient Reason is not a metaphysical statement. there are clear examples of other metaphysical statements, known intuitively to be true, that contradict the Principle of Sufficient Reason. according to Rowe, there are no statements at all that can be known intuitively to be true.