Social Studies
Social Studies, 30.08.2021 21:00, Aprillove7939

Why bakugou is not toxic just so you know i don't hate bakugou for any reason he's actually my favourite character

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00, kaileyy06
Match the following items. 1. free enterprise system 2. mixed economy 3. the former soviet union 4. land and capital (a) private and state ownership of business (b) factors of production (c) private ownership of capital (d) command economy
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, axleon11
The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00, monicagalarza
Which supreme court dressed the second a. presser v. illinois b. quilici v. the village of morton grove c. united states v. cruikshank d. united states v. miller
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50, Betzabeth671
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Why bakugou is not toxic just so you know i don't hate bakugou for any reason he's actually my fa...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 28.07.2019 19:00