What are the causes of frequent changes in the constitution of Nepal

urgent ​

In the past 68 years, Nepal has transitioned from a feudal society with authoritarian rule to a modern society with democratic rule. A period of transition is painful and many mistakes are made. The road to democracy is not an easy one. It’s not like going from A to B by an airplane or train. It’s more like finding the right path from many different routes. Sometimes, we think we’ve found the right road, but then it turns out to be the wrong one. So we have to rewrite the rules. This is the reason our constitution has been changing so frequently.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answerdavid strayer;