Tabitha listed her property for sale, but it's been on the market for several months with no offers. She decides to terminate her listing agreement and rent the property out instead of selling it. Assuming that her listing agent has fulfilled all of his responsibilities under the contract, can Tabitha terminate the contract before its expiration date? a. Only if she and the listing agent mutually agree to terminate the agreement.
b. Only if she succeeds in converting it to a rental.
c. Yes because she's received no offers on the listing.
d. Yes, she is entitled to terminate at any time.

Tabitha can only terminate the contract before its expiration date if she and the listing agent mutually agree to terminate the agreement.

A contract could be defined as an agreement between two parties in which each party would have to fulfill their commitment as agreed or written in the document that was signed within the period of time agreed. When a party pulls out from the contract without proper negotiation and agreement with the other party involved the following would happen;

-> The defaulting party would be sued to court

-> The defaulting party would pay for damages which he or she was sued for.

With these into consideration, a partner cannot pull out of contract until they meet an agreement with the other party involved, failure to do this would lead to damages on the partner leaving.

Click this for more;

facts: the 14th amendment

the 14th amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws.

the 14th amendment was intended to protect the rights of former slaves after the american civil war.

the 14th amendment was approved by congress in june of 1866 and ratified by the states on july 9, 1868.

the 14th amendment establishes that all persons born in the united states are citizens and are guaranteed all the rights of citizenship.

the 14th amendment establishes that the law protects all citizens equally.

in this case the passage of the 14th amendment   that was violated was the last part in which it states that there is equal protection of the law.

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.