Should social reform be provided by citizens or the government? Is volunteering a responsibility of all citizens? Why or why not?
How can local government shape the lives of citizens?

Social reform should be provided by the government because they have the funds to provide the changes compared to the citizens.

Volunteering shouldn't be a responsibility for all citizens because some may not have the time to do volunteer work, or some may have special conditions which prevent them from doing volunteer work.

Local Governments could shape the lives of citizens by creating a bigger sense of community and also involving the young people in that area. Local Governments could also help provide the necessary things, funds, or reforms that the people need, which the main government isn't providing for them.

i believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the role of campaign committees is to act as a bridge between state and local campaigns.