When we realize that relativism implies that the individuals we would normally identify as inspiring moral leaders and activists actually have to be considered as moral wrongdoers:. a. we begin to see the importance of the 'making anything right' argument.
b. we begin to see the importance of the moral reformers argument.
c. we begin to see the importance of the terror argument.
d. we begin to see the importance of the social groups argument.

Option B

Explanation:

The argument of moral reformer can be understood by using an example. If S would be a moral reformer, she is someone who believes that some aspects of her personal society's ethical compass are erroneous; she believes that behaviors that the code declares to be immoral are actually acceptable, or conversely.

Thus, both the moral reformers and relativism implies that there is not one correct actions but many as per the perspective of different doers.