Social Studies, 05.07.2021 20:00, esuqugip9498
Amber claims that, for mountain climbing, no shoes are better than Nikverse brand shoes. But that's ridiculous. Given the choice between no shoes and Nikverse brand shoes, no mountain climber would choose to climb without shoes. Above passage commit a fallacy. Specifically, it commit the fallacy of equivocation, and it commit the fallacy of amphiboly.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00, chloebaby8
What would the world be look like if we live without having news?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30, gafran
Ascientist successfully predicts the outcome of an experiment. you watch carefully and know he didn't cheat. the scientist's success shows that: a) the scientist knows absolute truth about this experiment; success is not possible unless you know the truthb) the scientist was just lucky; no one ever knows what's going on, so successful predictions require luckc) the scientist may know the truth, or at least know something that is close to the truth, or the scientist may have gotten lucky this time; you can't be absolutely sured) the scientist really was cheating, even though you didn't see the cheating; no one can get things right, except by cheatinge) the scientist spent the night at a particular hotel chain and go a free breakfast, giving the scientist the ability to do amazing things
Answers: 1
Amber claims that, for mountain climbing, no shoes are better than Nikverse brand shoes. But that's...
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 03:20
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 03:20
Chemistry, 18.03.2021 03:20
Chemistry, 18.03.2021 03:20
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 03:20
Physics, 18.03.2021 03:20