Social Studies, 05.07.2021 19:40, noriko002
Imagine a therapist is interested in measuring her client's propensity for taking risks. She decides to use both an objective test for the trait of risk-taking and an unstructured interview. Which argument below best defends her choice?
A. The unstructured interview allows the subject to relax in a non-threatening, natural setting, which balances out the anxiety produced by pen-and-paper tests.
B. The unstructured interview controls for cultural biases, which are difficult to completely remove from an objective personality test.
C. The objective test provides specific, non-subjective information about risk-taking tendencies while the unstructured interview allows for deeper explanations of the thought processes behind that information.
D. The objective test alleviates the subject's desire to provide socially acceptable answers, which balances out the need to impress the in-person interviewer.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:20, alondra6838
Jane is a new therapist who works with couples and families. her decision was motivated by her sister melinda’s experience of spousal abuse. when jane meets with her supervisor to review cases, he points out that jane takes sides with her female clients when they cry or describe intense conflicts with their husbands. she believes her supervisor is blind to the signs of abuse. what critical thinking pitfall do jane’s reactions show?
Answers: 1
Imagine a therapist is interested in measuring her client's propensity for taking risks. She decides...
Social Studies, 18.11.2020 21:10
Physics, 18.11.2020 21:10
Chemistry, 18.11.2020 21:10
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 21:10